VIDEO: GULF DEATH MASS: “corexit” = “corrects it”. BP doens’t matter, only genocide spraying does!
The Antimatter Radio Show
Radical Skepticism & Empiricism! Where Conspiracy Becomes Science
Home » VIDEO: GULF DEATH MASS: “corexit” = “corrects it”. BP doens’t matter, only genocide spraying does!
14 Comments
Leave a Reply
The Author
This post was written by Jeff - Antimatter Radio on Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:44. Jeff - Antimatter Radio has written 78 posts on this blog.
I agree, the dispersant isn’t for the oil but dispersing people. There has not been one chemtrail in my area for 2 months, which are usually being sprayed at least 4 days out of a week . Are they using those plans in the Gulf now to spray Corexit in massive quantities? That is certainly where the evidence is pointing. I have family that lives 150 miles south of me they are usually getting the same treatment but nothing since the so called oil spill.
Here is a video of a guy I have been following from the Pensacola area, he never says anything about the water fizzing like our boy pcola. But this is proof in my opinion that the Coexit is causing health issues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1NP7i6XPRU
No evidence of oil anywhere? Just red gooey stuff’? No leak? And you claim those of us who have seen it are drinking the Kool-Aid? Hoo, wow. So then what is the red gooey stuff? I enjoyed how you convinced yourself as to what Corexit means. Perhaps that is your whole agenda – convincing yourself. It’s working, but not on me.
No chemtrails here in middle Tennessee for three weeks.
@Lydia, yeah, they need all the planes they can get down in the ritual zone of the Gulf wag-the-dog, nothing-but-spraying zone.
Corexit = oil is found in core’s (extracted from the boreholes), you use this dispersant to extract oil out of the core in the ground. its like a soap….cleaning the core of oil. now they are using it in the sea…
@ V….. can you post some pictures or video of the oil? We’d all really like to see it! No kidding, I’m sure Jeff or anybody else that holds the idea that this Gulf thing is a scam would love to be proven wrong so we can get on with our lives. See, the problem is that there is no convincing evidence. And the PColas and a-hole youtube “film makers” in our lives really need to go back to school and re-take some into to filming classes again because they are beyond ridiculous. So please, can you convince me with some evidence? I could really use some convincing now!
@MInCA and V, yes, post ‘em up, get landmarks and ways to prove dates (cell phone) too, so we know where you are. I am ready to change my opinion on the superfake spill, just as soon as somebody shows me something that looks like more than splashes here and there of red stuff on beaches once in a while. Thx. J
“Core Exit” …moving the core outward …as in evacuation of the center outward
And …”Dispersant” …as in dispersing a population from a populated area outward.
“Horizon”? How does something in deep water affect the Horizon?
wow,
it is only in amazement that such independent-thoughts would give rise to violent responses. How dose this approach equate to reason? How dose threats and violence back an argument? It is a very sick world when disagreement equates to violence as opposed to individuality. The only thing worst would to see the victor of these tactics beat the 2nd to the final clone into submission. Then realizing you next to be cloned into Pricktum!
Take Care Pro. Jeff Antimatter
at about 3 minutes in your indicate that your opinion will be swayed if the media goes “from grand isle to tampa” and shows the testing of the oil “like they did with the exxon valdez”.
Everything else you are saying is that the media cannot convince you of anything or sway your opinion whatsoever. Beyond that your stated opinion on all videos is that nothing the “illuminati media” are saying right now is true, its all “FAKE!”. So why would you then say if they test the oil on MSM that you would then change your position and be “wrong”.
Also along the same lines of not believing the media…..apparently you do when it comes to them saying that Corexit is being sprayed. Your whole “I’m Super Empirical” argument goes right out the window and you’ve contradicted yourself once again. Have you seen planes spraying chemicals over the gulf ocean? Have you tested the water for it? How can you be certain that Nalco Holding Company even exists to make said chemical? Have you been to their factory and seen the chemical processing plant? Or are you taking the media’s word for it? Not empirical enough for me Jeff. Go all the way with it or dont.
Its horribly convenient to pick and choose what mainstream media articles you believe to be true and not and then make blanket statements from there that make your opinions seem like some sort of scifi fact.
@V I agree with the whole “convincing yourself” statement. That’s this entire ‘gulf hoax’ portion of the website in a nutshell.
@gulf hoax, I have said in my videos over and over that ‘red goo is showing up on a beach here and there’, so that much in the illuminati mass media is true, and i only say that because people I know in the are down there have told me it is from what they saw. I clearly said that ‘so far no evidence of oil spill exists,’ but then added that ‘if any does come about, i will change my opinion.’ Clearly it’s just a way of saying at this point from all we can tell from our eyes, there was no oil spill. BUT, you do make a good point about corexit, and in fact I have thought of that myself, that my only evidence that it exists and was sprayed and all is from the Illuminati mass media. I do know a few people reporting illnesses down there at high frequency suddenly, so I drew the connection between spraying and illnesses, but you have a point, that I don’t have any evidence of anything to do with that unless I can get some real evidence of planes showering stuff and finding out what it is. So, good point, I stand corrected, and I will admit that and correct that issue in an upcoming vid this week. So, you got me on one contradiction (I prefer to use the word ‘error’). I am human, and that happens. Being human, battling to make ‘perfect’ empirical moves is tough, so there, I confess my error. But you want to say I am contradicting myself all over, maybe i have made other errors, but perhaps you could focus on some of my correct points also, instead of just avoiding them with this other stuff you are talking about? Also, please note that I have to approve all these comments for my site, and I approved yours unedited. I have nothing to hide, I am not trying to be some ‘perfect’ genious here, I just want the truth, and if I make a m istake, I have no ego battle to play in trying to convince that I did not. The fact is that I have here, you pointed it out, and “in the back of my mind”, I have thought of this error before reading your note, also.
@gulf hoax, Ok, so now that I have agreed, and admitted my error, now it’s your turn to talk. Instead of simply ignoring all the other clear evidence I have presented to this totally fake non-event, why don’t you address some of it, without giving me wild theories, but rather empirical data (not TV images). And not wild, unverified ideas of how for the first time in history we have a brick-red colored oil spill. How about some real evidence we can all SEE. Show us.
I highly respect your lack of censorship Jeff.
It would be really easy to remove content that doesn’t fit your viewpoint and i was already aware of your honesty in that regard so thank you.
In reply to what you’ve said I don’t feel like I can discuss anything openly within your frame of mind, this empirical to the end method of yours just makes me walk away from the entire topic because i cannot be certain of anything going on hundreds of miles away from me. When I think the way your suggesting I feel like I’m living the Truman Show or some sick Matrix reality wherein i cannot be certain of anything(not even what i can see) so it all must be an illusion or a setup by some evil master(Illuminati).
That said ill try and play ball. So you don’t believe there to be an oil spill because all given evidence is of something that doesn’t look like oil to you….the red tar balls and reddish particulate in the water at beaches. You have suggested that this red oil-like substance has been PLANTED to provide evidence of a non event that is the foundation for a different agenda. Can my rebuttal be….
Why not PLANT ‘not red’ oil? Why not use whatever other oil that looks real to you and others instead of this other substance you claim is not oil. Also your basis for stating that its not oil is because its red, but i haven’t heard anything else of substance from you….granted i haven’t and will not watch all your videos. So it’s RED and that means its not real? Whats empirical about that? Please besides the color please tell us what else makes it unbelievable. There’s lots of the red stuff and regardless of the color it is or WHAT it is, it seems to have created an environmental hazard that is well known to a large portion of the gulf coast region. Countless videos of people standing on the beach filming this substance cannot all be faked in my opinion. But that’s not what your claiming, your claiming the substance itself is fake in some way….so you say maybe its a mud volcano…. sure. SO whats the point though, lets say its mud and they want us to believe its oil…..whats the next step in your logic…I’m interested.